Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat PDF

Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat PDF
  • Paperback
  • 176 pages
  • Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat
  • J. Sakai
  • English
  • 17 November 2019

Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat❮BOOKS❯ ✻ Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat ✴ Author J. Sakai – Essayreview.co.uk The authoritative attack on the idea that the American working class is primarily white, with Black, Asian and Indian labour being littlethan special interest groups This book presents US history from The authoritative attack on the Mythology of PDF/EPUB æ idea that the American working class is primarily white, with Black, Asian and Indian labour being littlethan special interest groups This book presents US history from a working class, revolutionary and non white perspective.


About the Author: J. Sakai

Is a well known author, Mythology of PDF/EPUB æ some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat book, this is one of the most wanted J Sakai author readers around the world.


10 thoughts on “Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat

  1. says:

    Let me start by saying that the main thing on my mind while reading Settlers was the following questions Why have I never seen this book or most of the information included in it referenced by any self described leftist academics Why have I instead heard mostly the same flawed, incomplete, and misleading interpretations of American history that Sakai discredits From the first pages of Settlers I got a hint of why It s not because Sakai isn t accurate most of the time, but instead because the Let me start by saying that the main thing on my mind while reading Settlers was the following questions Why have I never seen this book or most of the information included in it referenced by any self described leftist academics Why have I instead heard mostly the same flawed, incomplete, and misleading interpretations of American history that Sakai discredits From the first pages of Settlers I got a hint of why It s not because Sakai isn t accurate most of the time, but instead because the style of writing takes the exact tone that evokes hostility from leftists who at core believe white supremacy is only for broke white Republicans and from lukewarm liberals who prefer multiculturalist reform strategies that involve assimilation as am answer for racial minorities I am skeptical that the people who are most damned by this piece can fall out of love with whiteness long enough to actually see any of Sakai s points all points that must be addressed if you are proposing radicalism or revolutionary idea that is afraid of alienating white identified people Overall, this book kept me repeatedly shocked because on nearly every page there was a new detail that I never heard in a classroom discussion of the very same time periods and events in history For example, at one point I was somewhat annoyed at the fact that I was reading new details that were not addressed in Ira Katznelson s When Affirmative Action Was White Specifically, Katznelson presented the time period as if it was merely an unplanned, unintentional result that Black veterans were left out of New Deal benefits, yet Sakai provides details suggesting that it was NOT coincidence, but instead part of a very large pattern in which the government administration was nakedly and blatantly pursuing imperialist goals, enacting violence on anyone who got in the way Similarly, I ve repeatedly heard of various rebellions being touted by leftists as evidence of white Black unity in anti capitalist action, but Sakai also offers some pretty unignorable details that raise questions about the intentions of people circulating these misleading narratives My biggest take away from this book is that people are sorely mistaken and severely misinformed if they think anti capitalist action in the West can stand alone rather than being guided first and foremost by an internationalist strategy that struggles against imperialist capitalism Excellent and necessary read, especially if you re for some reason buying the idea that unity or some other empty concept will solve problems that are the direct consequence of the colonialist and imperialist origins of the seat of the Empire

  2. says:

    Settlers has been the most influential book I ve ever read clueing me into the revisionism and pro imperialism endemic among the white Euro Amerikan Left since its birth Sakai chronicles the history of Euro Amerikans since they first set foot on the North American continent and the genocide, exploitation, and oppression that has been perpetuated through the centuries The contradictions between oppressor and oppressed nations is conveniently overlooked by the white Left and Sakai s analysis Settlers has been the most influential book I ve ever read clueing me into the revisionism and pro imperialism endemic among the white Euro Amerikan Left since its birth Sakai chronicles the history of Euro Amerikans since they first set foot on the North American continent and the genocide, exploitation, and oppression that has been perpetuated through the centuries The contradictions between oppressor and oppressed nations is conveniently overlooked by the white Left and Sakai s analysis focuses exactly on that and the historic facts that back his theory up As the title says, Sakai breaks down the myth of the white proletariat as well as the benefits of strategic racial integrationalism, which has historically resulted in further oppression of the oppressed time immemorial This should be complusory reading for all communists of any race for the brilliant insights Modern white communists continue to disregard Sakai s theory as the imperialist charateristic of the priveleged white Left lives on unabashedly Let this timeless classic be a warning to future leftists of what can happen when the contradictions between nations are not taken into account

  3. says:

    The author takes an anti Marxist racialist and essentialist approach to summarize a highly distorted history of the relationship between race, nationality and class in the US Ends up fawning over someone who colaborated with the KKK and considered himself a fascist.Don t waste your time with this.

  4. says:

    The definitive book on Why You Should Hate Amerikkka Not only educational, but entertaining too A must read book for radicals of all stripes.

  5. says:

    Completely upends the myths of racism as some sort of unfortunate transistory phenomenon, the situation of whites as comparable to other groups and the idea that radical movements are some sort of white only thing It has problems that are inevitable for a pretty short book many areas being somewhat rushed through but it still manages to be pretty comprehensive of what it does cover and to clearly and forcefully show the truth of what it argues Absolutely essential and it s fucked up but Completely upends the myths of racism as some sort of unfortunate transistory phenomenon, the situation of whites as comparable to other groups and the idea that radical movements are some sort of white only thing It has problems that are inevitable for a pretty short book many areas being somewhat rushed through but it still manages to be pretty comprehensive of what it does cover and to clearly and forcefully show the truth of what it argues Absolutely essential and it s fucked up but unsurprising how little of what s discussed here is considered by the radical left and how little follow up there s been on the points raised which are essential to challenging the reality of the imperialist, capitalist system

  6. says:

    In many ways J Sakai s Settlers was a groundbreaking book for that sliver of the North American left that one may term revolutionary People from all strains of the radical left took notice of its analysis It was promoted by the Love Rage Revolutionary Anarchist Federation, the Maoist International Movement and various radical feminist, anti imperialist and anti racist organizations The book is still being debated, interpreted, and re interpreted today.Certainly, for myself, it was a book In many ways J Sakai s Settlers was a groundbreaking book for that sliver of the North American left that one may term revolutionary People from all strains of the radical left took notice of its analysis It was promoted by the Love Rage Revolutionary Anarchist Federation, the Maoist International Movement and various radical feminist, anti imperialist and anti racist organizations The book is still being debated, interpreted, and re interpreted today.Certainly, for myself, it was a book that completely changed by political frame of reference, and continued to do so as i re read it every few years ever since a comrade first lent me a copy in the eighties

  7. says:

    To echo the words of Kersplebedeb the book is groundbreaking Magnificently simple and yet so earth shattering for anyone raised on a heavy diet of bourgeois historicism Truly rewriting the history of settler colonialism in a way which highlights the utter ugliness of it all.

  8. says:

    This is a dodgy book Its radical and unflinchingly anti racist and anti imperialist nature make it very appealing to those with a sense for justice but no principled marxist framework within which to make sense of it, but its politics and conclusion sees whiteness as the death of socialist organising it constitutes a limit as absolute and inescapable as that of classes If you must read it, do so for its vivid and well sourced descriptions of violence against all oppressed and colonized people This is a dodgy book Its radical and unflinchingly anti racist and anti imperialist nature make it very appealing to those with a sense for justice but no principled marxist framework within which to make sense of it, but its politics and conclusion sees whiteness as the death of socialist organising it constitutes a limit as absolute and inescapable as that of classes If you must read it, do so for its vivid and well sourced descriptions of violence against all oppressed and colonized people do not, however, take Sakai s judgements on the complicity and agency of the non black working class as objectively truthful That in other work he deems nazism as a radical and genuinely anti capitalist movement only makes my suspicion of his maoism all the greater.Old review, unredacted view spoiler This is the book Roediger s Class, Race and Marxism ought to have been When you first read Capital, it is as if reality reconstitutes itself around now excavated ley lines in a series of vast and grinding mutations Settlers unlocks a second, necessary, explosive landslide Settlers, at its core, lays down a challenge to marxism as it was traditionally understood While there are a number of Euro Amerikan workers, they no longer combine into a separate proletarian class 146 Why is it that the United States have, ironically, never known a genuinely revolutionary movement Combining proletarian historiography and sprinklings of Marx, Lenin and Mao, J Sakai dissects the class composition of the United States from its early years and charts the interaction of the white elite and slaves, immigrants, colonial subjects, and other racialized groups, demonstrating that a class analysis that fails to take race into account is wrong not just historically but also theoretically By way of subaltern anecdotes, official statistics and press snippets, Sakai very convincingly argues that in the instances where white US labour movements have been successful, these successes were bought at the cost of third world immiseration both locally and internationally where solidarity seemingly transcended racial divisions, this was a matter of tactical unity which never left the umbrella of white supremacist overall strategy The only emancipatory movements which could not be recuperated by a white elite were black nationalist movements hence the brutal crackdown on the Black Panther Party, the Puerto Rican independence movement and analogous organizations Seemingly proclaiming fidelity to Mao s dictum that to be attacked by the enemy is not a bad thing but a good thing, Sakai sheds a sympathetic light on black historical actors who held that the KKK are, in fact, the most authentic and helpful whites they, at least, do not cover up the antagonism which in decent America is buried under metaphors and slogans This reader was reminded of the similar development in South Africa which nation, as a settler society par excellence, also gets its comeuppance in the book that recognizes that the ideal of the post racial rainbow nation is littlethan an ideological bribe which allows merciless class and hence race based oppressions to root themselves yetdeeply.While Settlers may initially seem to forego sophisticated analysis for a one dimensional racial perspective, it is this very attention to the sensuous reality again 146 of the US class system that allows it to take into account the full complexity of class nature in a settler society on top of that, it has the numbers and documentary artifacts to back this analysis up.As Settlers is too rich to fully critique in the scope of a review, I ll keep my few doubts and questions limited to the following Especially in the the first half of the book focusing on the 17 19th century, some of thefanciful anecdotes don t always seem to be sourced On other occasions, anecdotes are sometimes kneaded into very skewed historical setpieces for instance, Sufi Abdul Hamid, whom Settlers casts as an excentric but influential Black Nationalist figurehead, was in his time popularly known as the Black Hitler , owing to his vehement and sustained antisemitism A nuanced discussion on this matter could have been very fruitful, even if it would sidetrack Sakai s otherwise crystal clear analysis The mechanisms through which nonwhite labour is expelled from unionized sectors is left unspecified while of course class based systematic racism is the culprit, how this tends to manifest itself is not made explicit Mass firings Selective hiring Arbitrary degree conditions Sakai tends to psychologize the abstract movement of capital, and while the relation of dispassionate capitalism to the very libidinal scourge of racism is of utmost importance, this technique runs the risk of smoothing over the possibly resistant will of individuals and ontologizing racism in the same way Ta Nehisi Coates is sometimes accused of doing This is not in and of itself a knock against Settlers the strength of marxist critique is exactly its ability to look beyond the particular to grasp a universalized system but is not further commented on in the book.In conclusion, Settlers is as essential as Capital it educates on the pitfalls of race blind social movements, social analysis that stops at the border and does not take into account the way levers and pulleys in the centre run through the periphery, and transracial alliances The way out, Sakai would suggest, consists of working through all these matters black and female liberation cannot just be a facet of a communist movement, but is the prime contradiction of contemporary US empire One hundred percent obligatory reading hide spoiler

  9. says:

    Missing the kind of academic rigor expected of contemporary political philosophy, the book is absent large numbers of supporting citations and is riddled with illogical statements, ignored in favour of subjective polemics that are not critically analysed or supported As a non American looking to understand race relations in America, I am absolutely confused at the sheer number of ahistorical assertions that seem to have no grounding in statistics or facts If you re trying to understand racism Missing the kind of academic rigor expected of contemporary political philosophy, the book is absent large numbers of supporting citations and is riddled with illogical statements, ignored in favour of subjective polemics that are not critically analysed or supported As a non American looking to understand race relations in America, I am absolutely confused at the sheer number of ahistorical assertions that seem to have no grounding in statistics or facts If you re trying to understand racism in contemporary Western society, or are interested in the material factors of oppression, this is probably the last book you should read Of particular note is the author s endless assertions that material reality, such as class, doesn t really exist, and seems completely incompatible with developing the kind of anti racist working class politics that used to be very common within the left The author s key premise is completely at odds with any kind of liberatory politics and completely incompatible with a leftist, marxist, or even a liberal or libertarian view, which appears to make it somewhat irrelevant in today s political climate

  10. says:

    The central thesis of the book, that white American workers lack the class consciousness thatoppressed races have, seems contrived and unsupported But through the discussion Sakai uncovers the important intersections of race and class across American history, and rightly calls out the white left for its racist past and present Lots of interesting information if you can take it with a big grain of salt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *